By Dariusz Jemielniak
In Common Knowledge?, Dariusz Jemielniak attracts on his educational services and years of lively participation in the Wikipedia neighborhood to take readers contained in the website, illuminating the way it features and deconstructing its certain association. opposed to a backdrop of misconceptions approximately its governance, authenticity, and accessibility, Jemielniak supplies the 1st ethnography of Wikipedia, revealing that it's not completely on the mercy of the general public: as an alternative, it balances open entry and gear with a different paperwork that takes a web page from conventional organizational types. alongside the best way, Jemielniak comprises interesting instances that spotlight the tug of struggle one of the contributors as they forge forward during this pioneering environment.
Read Online or Download Common knowledge? : an ethnography of Wikipedia PDF
Similar encyclopedias books
This reference offers a accomplished and obtainable creation to movie and movie experiences, masking such points as creation, nationwide traditions, studios, genres, serious conception and movie historical past. nearly 2 hundred entries disguise particular issues, together with performing, censorship, modifying, lighting fixtures and others.
Many are conversant in the tips of Copernicus, Descartes, and Galileo. yet the following the reader is usually brought to lesser recognized principles and members to the medical Revolution, comparable to the mathematical Bernoulli family members and Andreas Vesalius, whose anatomical charts revolutionized the learn of the human physique.
`Every from time to time one stumbles throughout a breath of unpolluted air and this useful examine advisor is definitely one in all them! .. will probably be without doubt fresh for these people who continue going to the sector and who probably have forgotten the human size of study. when you supervise scholars the ebook might be an invaluable resource of concept.
Additional info for Common knowledge? : an ethnography of Wikipedia
While people programming in open-source environments often enjoy some recognition from their colleagues or can put their experience on a résumé, this is almost never the case for Wikipedia editors or functionaries. On Wikipedia, unlike in open-source-software projects but similar to online games such as World of Warcraft or Tibia, recognition and career advancement are gained mainly within and for the community and not for the outside world. However, there are still many similarities with open-source ventures (Shirky, 2005).
The rules of civilized discourse reflect those used in academia: discussion is based solely on the strength of the argument rather than eristic tricks or participant status. In any case, blocking users is meant to be preventive rather than punitive and to ensure that, in the future, norms are respected. A word enormously respected on Wikipedia is “consensus” (CON). The norm of consensus requires all editors to seek a solution acceptable to the community. It does not necessarily mean unanimity, but it emphasizes striving for hypothetical unity.
I wanted to correct it, but one of the administrators insisted that the Polish parliamentary acts, in which only male nouns were used, should be considered authoritative. I argued that such acts are always written with just one form for ease of reading. However, my argument was moot without valid published sources using female forms of the positions, and I was not able to find any. Thus, I decided to create a source: through my publisher I contacted a well-known professor of linguistics and asked him to write an opinion in an online language 2 2 W i k i p e d i a i n S h o r t advisory portal he ran, under the publisher’s auspices.
Common knowledge? : an ethnography of Wikipedia by Dariusz Jemielniak